refactor(logging): 迁移日志记录到 Zerolog 并优化错误处理

- 将日志记录库从 Logrus 替换为 Zerolog，提升性能和灵活性 - 更新各个模块的日志记录方式，确保一致性 - 优化错误处理逻辑，确保在发生错误时能够正确记录并传递错误信息 - 移除不再使用的错误处理字段，简化代码结构 - 更新相关文档以反映新的日志记录和错误处理机制
2026-04-13 00:38:50 +08:00
parent 298dbcbcb1
commit 0991555c2d
445 changed files with 59349 additions and 13297 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+## Reference:
+   CBOR Encoding is described in [RFC7049](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7049)
+
+## Comparison of JSON vs CBOR
+
+Two main areas of reduction are:
+
+1. CPU usage to write a log msg 
+2. Size (in bytes) of log messages.
+
+
+CPU Usage savings are below:
+```
+name                                    JSON time/op    CBOR time/op   delta
+Info-32                                   15.3ns ± 1%    11.7ns ± 3%  -23.78%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)      
+ContextFields-32                          16.2ns ± 2%    12.3ns ± 3%  -23.97%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)       
+ContextAppend-32                          6.70ns ± 0%    6.20ns ± 0%   -7.44%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)       
+LogFields-32                              66.4ns ± 0%    24.6ns ± 2%  -62.89%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)      
+LogArrayObject-32                          911ns ±11%     768ns ± 6%  -15.64%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)     
+LogFieldType/Floats-32                    70.3ns ± 2%    29.5ns ± 1%  -57.98%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)     
+LogFieldType/Err-32                       14.0ns ± 3%    12.1ns ± 8%  -13.20%  (p=0.000 n=8+10)      
+LogFieldType/Dur-32                       17.2ns ± 2%    13.1ns ± 1%  -24.27%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)      
+LogFieldType/Object-32                    54.3ns ±11%    52.3ns ± 7%     ~     (p=0.239 n=10+10)     
+LogFieldType/Ints-32                      20.3ns ± 2%    15.1ns ± 2%  -25.50%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)      
+LogFieldType/Interfaces-32                 642ns ±11%     621ns ± 9%     ~     (p=0.118 n=10+10)     
+LogFieldType/Interface(Objects)-32         635ns ±13%     632ns ± 9%     ~     (p=0.592 n=10+10)     
+LogFieldType/Times-32                      294ns ± 0%      27ns ± 1%  -90.71%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)      
+LogFieldType/Durs-32                       121ns ± 0%      33ns ± 2%  -72.44%  (p=0.000 n=9+9)       
+LogFieldType/Interface(Object)-32         56.6ns ± 8%    52.3ns ± 8%   -7.54%  (p=0.007 n=10+10)     
+LogFieldType/Errs-32                      17.8ns ± 3%    16.1ns ± 2%   -9.71%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)      
+LogFieldType/Time-32                      40.5ns ± 1%    12.7ns ± 6%  -68.66%  (p=0.000 n=8+9)       
+LogFieldType/Bool-32                      12.0ns ± 5%    10.2ns ± 2%  -15.18%  (p=0.000 n=10+8)      
+LogFieldType/Bools-32                     17.2ns ± 2%    12.6ns ± 4%  -26.63%  (p=0.000 n=10+10)     
+LogFieldType/Int-32                       12.3ns ± 2%    11.2ns ± 4%   -9.27%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)      
+LogFieldType/Float-32                     16.7ns ± 1%    12.6ns ± 2%  -24.42%  (p=0.000 n=7+9)       
+LogFieldType/Str-32                       12.7ns ± 7%    11.3ns ± 7%  -10.88%  (p=0.000 n=10+9)      
+LogFieldType/Strs-32                      20.3ns ± 3%    18.2ns ± 3%  -10.25%  (p=0.000 n=9+10)      
+LogFieldType/Interface-32                  183ns ±12%     175ns ± 9%     ~     (p=0.078 n=10+10)     
+```
+
+Log message size savings is greatly dependent on the number and type of fields in the log message.
+Assuming this log message (with an Integer, timestamp and string, in addition to level).
+
+`{"level":"error","Fault":41650,"time":"2018-04-01T15:18:19-07:00","message":"Some Message"}`
+
+Two measurements were done for the log file sizes - one without any compression, second
+using [compress/zlib](https://golang.org/pkg/compress/zlib/). 
+
+Results for 10,000 log messages:
+
+| Log Format |  Plain File Size (in KB) | Compressed File Size (in KB) |
+| :--- | :---: | :---: |
+| JSON | 920 | 28 |
+| CBOR | 550 | 28 |
+
+The example used to calculate the above data is available in [Examples](examples).